TriNetra · Leaderboard
Ranked by what you find, not how often you show up.
Reputation on TriNetra is computed, not self-reported. Every accepted finding on a program carries a severity score, and a program's leaderboard ranks researchers by total severity points earned from findings that actually cleared validation — a Critical you got right outweighs a stack of Informational submissions that didn't move the needle.
- Only accepted findings contribute — submissions still in triage, or rejected as out-of-scope or duplicate, don't count toward your rank.
- Points scale with severity, so ranking rewards depth of impact over volume of reports.
- Ranking is computed per program first — each bounty program has its own leaderboard reflecting who's found the most impactful issues on that specific scope.
Finding submitted
A researcher reports a finding on a program.
Triage & validation
A human confirms it — duplicates and out-of-scope reports stop here.
Severity scored
Accepted findings get a CVSS-based severity — Critical outweighs Informational.
Points recomputed
The program's leaderboard updates live from severity-weighted totals.
Failed to load leaderboard: Failed to fetch
The in-product leaderboard view is admin-only today. This is the exact state a researcher role sees when opening it — not a placeholder, and not a bug.
The in-product leaderboard view is admin-only in the current build — we'd rather show you that honestly than dress up a mockup with rank numbers and handles that aren't real. What's real is the mechanism above: severity-weighted points, computed live, per program.
Recognition beyond the number.
Programs that opt into a hall of fame give top contributors lasting, public recognition tied to their profile — not just a rank that resets when the next program launches.
Beyond any one program
Looking for the full community picture?
Cross-program reputation, writeups, and researcher-to-researcher discussion live at securityboat.community — separate from any single client's program leaderboard.